The following case studies are anonymised and illustrative of the type of work undertaken. All identifying details have been removed or altered to protect client confidentiality.
Confidentiality Notice: All case studies are fully anonymised. No client, firm, or defendant can be identified from the information presented.
Prosecution relied upon extracted messaging data to allege a pre-meditated agreement between defendants. Independent forensic analysis of the full extraction — including metadata, application-layer timestamps, and deleted message fragments — demonstrated that the messages had been selectively presented and could be interpreted in a materially different way consistent with the defence case.
Examination of a former employee's work laptop and personal device following a data theft allegation. Forensic analysis identified USB device connection history, file access timestamps, cloud upload activity, and email attachments confirming the systematic transfer of confidential client data in the weeks preceding the employee's resignation.
Defence instructed to review prosecution digital evidence in a serious assault case. Analysis of device timestamps, network connection logs, and cell site data revealed a 47-minute discrepancy in the prosecution timeline. The expert report identified that the police forensic analyst had failed to account for UTC/BST offset errors, materially undermining the prosecution case.
Instructed to examine a company director's personal and work devices in connection with a shareholder dispute. File carving of unallocated disk space recovered deleted correspondence and financial spreadsheets that had been intentionally deleted. Recovered material proved pivotal to the claimant's case on liability.
Defendant denied being at a particular location at the time of an alleged offence. Forensic extraction of geolocation data, Wi-Fi connection logs, and app usage timestamps from the defendant's mobile device provided objective corroboration of the alibi, resulting in the prosecution offering no evidence.
Prosecution alleged that the defendant had deliberately accessed prohibited online content. Forensic examination of the device revealed the presence of a commercial remote access trojan (RAT) consistent with third-party access. Expert report presented an alternative hypothesis demonstrating that the device could have been remotely controlled without the defendant's knowledge.
Contact us for a confidential case assessment. Initial consultations are available at no obligation.